The music scene at Wesleyan University has been the subject of books and countless news articles, all while capturing the attention of young artists and musicians around the country. And why not? Recent graduates, including Santigold, Himanshu Suri and Victor Vazquez of Das Racist, Dylan Rau and Ted Feldman of Bear Hands, as well as Ben Goldwasser and Andrew VanWyngarden of MGMT, have been fixtures of the indie music scene of the past decade. Even aside from the musical success of its recent graduates, the university boasts a popular music department with ensembles ranging from an Early Music Collegium to a renowned gamelan.
“Empirically, Wesleyan is unique,” says Professor of Music Mark Slobin. “Our department and music scene is bigger and more diverse than any other school of its size.” At the heart of Wesleyan’s musical culture, both in and outside of the classroom, is a vision that redefines how we view music academically and culturally. “Our program’s philosophy is simple: all musics deserve study, all musics are equal. That concept has guided our department for the last fifty years.”
Wesleyan is by no means alone in redefining how today’s musicians should think about music. Enter Music 151, an intermediate music theory course at Bowdoin College. Rather than analyzing Bach, Beethoven, or Brahms to learn the basics of how to write and arrange music, students cut their teeth on a more familiar musical role model – the Beatles.
Professors report that more and more of their students have grown up in jazz, popular, and world musics with little to no instruction in Classical theory and performance.
“How do we bring students to us?” asks Bowdoin Music Department Chair Robby Greenlee, “We connect what we teach to what they listen to. We want our students to leave our department being able to engage with all kinds of music thoughtfully and, for our majors, to be in a position to pursue graduate degrees in performance, composition, or musicology. In order to do this, we need to meet students where they’re coming from.”
In interviews with faculty members from Wesleyan, Bowdoin, Bates, Williams, and Amherst, it became clear that academics are now looking at a different teaching model, because the musical backgrounds and interests of students have drastically shifted over the last few decades. While many majors, minors, and participants have received training in European Classical music, professors report that more and more of their students have grown up in jazz, popular, and world musics with little to no instruction in Classical theory and performance.
The New Model
In adopting a new model to address the changing nature of music in our culture, academic departments have redesigned their curriculums and focused on bringing in new faculty who can speak to the interests of a new generation of musicians. “We want to stay abreast of changes in the disciplinary scene, the educational philosophy. In many ways, we want to lead that academic change. Our most recent hire, Tracy McMullen, has a background in jazz and popular music. Right now, she’s teaching a course on Hip Hop. She has the ability to go into the central musical lives of students, and then she can expand their understanding of that music,” says Greenlee.
Like Bowdoin, Amherst College has worked on redesigning their curriculum and augmenting their faculty to connect to student interests. “Our last full-time faculty hires have been in ethnomusicology and popular music/jazz. We want to be able to teach the music of the Middle Ages right up through the music of the present,” says chair of the Music Department Eric Sawyer. Out of a department of five to six full-time music faculty at Amherst, having two professors with non-Classical background represents a significant commitment to broadening the idea of ‘significant’ music.
Aside from hiring faculty whose primary research is in popular or world musics, departments have also added an array of courses to their curriculum. “We offer multiple courses in Asian and African music and have two ensembles devoted to African musical traditions,” says Professor W. Anthony Sheppard of Williams College. “Starting next year, our majors will be required to take at least one course in world music/ethnomusicology. We have recently begun offering lessons in the singer/songwriter tradition and we also offer courses in popular music, including rock and global popular musics.”
Perhaps the best illustration of student interest meeting faculty demand exists in what tends to be the most popular concentration of music students at these liberal arts institutions: composition. “Our student composers’ pieces really highlight the diversity of the department,” says Associate Professor of Music at Bates College Dale Chapman. “I’ve heard string quartets, minimalist electronic compositions, a rock/pop oratorio, original jazz compositions, as well as film and multimedia projects by students. It’s a very inclusive list, and you really get the sense of bringing in the whole gamut of creative impulses.”
Professor Sawyer, resident composer at Amherst, stressed that he does try to meet his students at their points of interest, but also hopes to engage them with new ideas. “Most of my students come from a jazz or pop background. It’s what they’ve played and often what they are more interested in. However, they are open-minded. I try to balance their natural voice and comfort zone with the unencountered.”
Retaining the Old
Given the decrease of popularity in classical music among young musicians nationwide, it comes as no surprise that music departments, which traditionally have been run by academics trained in Western Classical music, have had some difficulty in reaching students. Despite the vast resources these colleges are able to devote to bringing dynamic and talented performers to their respective campuses, classical concerts are more often attended by aging community members than students.
“Student attendance is strongest in jazz and popular concerts. Yes, the student audiences for classical performance are generally smaller, but we’re trying to counter that trend,” says Chapman of Bates.
“We are always pushing students out of their comfort zone, asking them to confront the new and re-look at the old.”
Even as a more inclusive vision of music takes root in the academic philosophies of these departments, they continue to stress the importance of Classical and contemporary classical music. “We want to have it all: to answer student demand for technology-related music, popular music, and world music while not wanting to throw out Western art music,” says Sawyer. Amherst, like many of these music departments, still requires a course in Western Music history and teaches music theory through the language of Western Art music.
“We embrace a wide range of global and popular traditions, but our focus remains on European classical music,” says Professor Sheppard of William’s Music program. While stressing that these departments have all made considerable efforts to modernize, Western art music, from classical through the modern repertoire, remains an important if not fundamental element of these music departments.
“Ideally, all forms of musical study are interwoven and prove mutually reinforcing for our majors,” says Sheppard of Williams. “We want to ensure that our majors pursue a broad and multifaceted approach to studying music, while also focusing on a particular area such as composition, performance, music history or theory, or ethnomusicology. Our majors are living out the liberal arts ideal as they travel on any given day from a music history class, to a private lesson, to the library to study a score, to a rehearsal, and to experiencing live music as audience members.”
Is it possible that, by embracing gamelan, Hip-Hop, and Electronic music, we are replacing the great masters of European Classical Music? Institutions of higher learning, especially elite ones such as those mentioned in this article, have been part of the vanguard insisting on the relevance of composers as disparate as Carlo Gesualdo and John Cage. It is difficult not to let a broadening focus on music fuel comparisons between the cello and the djembe or Stravinsky and the Beatles in an unfavorable light. These notions of high art and low art pervade our musical pedagogy, and, ultimately, ask the wrong questions about music while damaging our society’s understanding of music as an art form.
A Shift in Music Education
We see the changes in music departments as a paradigm for music education in our country. Our young musicians should not feel insecure regarding the music they make nor should they feel stuck within the increasingly porous boundaries of genre. We know that neither sheet music, nor harmony, scales, nor etudes are the foundations of musical expression. Rhythm and pitch are the building blocks of music. Everything else, all the magic in the disparate sounds of our world, is just a reorganization of those principles.
When we value disparate artistic expression, we musicians may continue to create. When jazz borrows from hip-hop, when classical borrows from Rock, when Hindustani borrows from marching band, then we push as artists and better understand ourselves. The inclusivity embodied by music departments that listen to all music equally allows us ever more permutations and a redefinition of sound. We believe the future of music stems from a rather simple idea: all music is equal.
Originally published on Pavoh.org by Henry Hoagland and Laura Lamere – reach them at firstname.lastname@example.org